Back in 2011, at a Fourth Circuit Judicial Conference, Chief Justice John Roberts took a cheap shot at law professors and law reviews when he intoned: “Pick up a copy of any law review that you see, and the first article is likely to be, you know, the influence of Immanuel Kant on evidentiary approaches in 18th Century Bulgaria, or something, which I’m sure was of great interest to the academic that wrote it, but isn’t of much help to the bar. [read post]